edbticdt-climate

EDBT/ICDT climate change material
git clone https://a3nm.net/git/edbticdt-climate/
Log | Files | Refs

commit d6ae6a9b225f219810130292afe009245d8e0788
parent e615010e763b3f0f9010856233ded46f81e95c4e
Author: Antoine Amarilli <a3nm@a3nm.net>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:01:25 +0100

notes

Diffstat:
slides/notes.txt | 45+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/slides/notes.txt b/slides/notes.txt @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +- 40 participants max +- votes in PNG + +https://tcs4f.org/climate-crisis-and-edbticdt + +https://tcs4f.org/ + + + +Questions: +- timezones? changing the format? +- which scale of conferences? + https://blog.sigplan.org/2021/03/09/conferences-after-covid/ +- online conferences being accessible to many new people (but how many of them + actually engage?) +- cost of adapting to the new model? +- other kinds of impact? not just flying + https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05433 +- how to replicate social aspects? how to bootstrap social discussions? +- integrating new members of our community + https://blog.sigplan.org/2021/03/25/conferences-after-covid-an-early-career-perspective/ +- how to make "hubs" work? +- conference: spine (scientific program) + people discussing, how crucial is it? +- "proceedings of the ACM" idea, used at all conferences in SIGPLAN but one + (related to open access?) +- used at all conferences in SIGPLAN but one +- plans for next year? + + +Polls: + +1. Do you agree that EDBT/ICDT should adapt its practices (post-COVID) to mitigate climate change? +- Yes: 15, No: 0, Not sure: 4 +2. Do you believe that EDBT/ICDT should commit to the IPCC goals: reducing our emissions by at least 50% before 2030 (relative to pre-2020 levels +- Yes: 10, No: 1, Not sure: 6 +3. Should EDBT/ICDT authors be guaranteed that they do not have to physically travel to the conference? (if they cannot or do not want to) +- Yes: 11, No: 2, Not sure: 3 +4. Would you personally be ready, in future years, to only physically travel to EDBT/ICDT every other year (and reduce your emissions by 50%)? +- Yes: 12, No: 2, Not sure: 7 +5. My preferred model for EDBT/ICDT in the (post-COVID) future would be +- Business as usual: one physical conference every year: 0 +- On-site conference every year but with high-quality remote participation: 15 +- Online conference every year, but with one or many attractive "hubs": 3 +- Alternating between on-site and online: 2 +- Something else: 0