conference_footprint

compute the CO2 footprint of an academic conference
git clone https://a3nm.net/git/conference_footprint/
Log | Files | Refs

commit 14f2cc8dbea71ece63fa526210431ecd49500ca8
parent 05487dc5a19943cab7ec16d570ba59ea32c7b17d
Author: Antoine Amarilli <a3nm@a3nm.net>
Date:   Tue,  2 Sep 2025 16:56:14 +0200

changes

Diffstat:
2025/README.md | 9+++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2025/README.md b/2025/README.md @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ without updating them to ensure that the methodology is comparable. The number of onsite participants is a little higher, and the number of nonlocal onsite participants is a little lower. The footprints per nonlocal participant are significantly lower: a 22%-27% decrease (depending on whether -locals are included or not). Given that the profile of "long trips" is similar -to 2024, we ascribe this change to the location being more central. +locals are included or not). Including locals, we get to 202 kgCO2/participant +this year, compared to 260 kgCO2/participant last year. Given that the profile +of "long trips" is similar to 2024, we ascribe this change to the location being +more central. Indeed, if the same participants had come to Bordeaux (the 2024 venue), from/to the same places and the same transportation means, then the average @@ -123,3 +125,6 @@ changed who attends and how they travel -- but maybe this would not be a large change. So our best hypothesis is that essentially the same people came, by the same means, but the total travel to Saarbrücken was smaller. +Another piece for evidence for this is that the footprint per participant in +2023 (in Germany) was 225 kgCO2/participant, so similar to 2025. +